George Gilder has spent more than half a century making predictions that sounded implausible when he made them and obvious after they came true. He wrote about the social costs of family breakdown before most policymakers would acknowledge them. He championed supply-side economics before Ronald Reagan carried its principles into the White House. He foresaw portable personal computing when computers still occupied desks and corporate budgets. Today, he argues that the age of the microchip itself is nearing its culmination and that a new era of wafer-scale computing is beginning.
His intellectual method is almost stubbornly unfashionable. He does not describe himself as a consumer of daily news. He reads books. He studies long arcs rather than headlines. He follows underlying patterns rather than political fashions. That habit has allowed him to identify technological and economic shifts before they become visible to most observers. As he put it, “I learned by reading books. I don’t follow the news from day to day.”
Gilder’s current focus is on computing architecture. He believes the familiar model of vast data centers filled with racks of interconnected chips has reached a point of diminishing returns. In its place, he sees wafer-scale computing, where entire computing systems are built across a single wafer rather than being divided into hundreds of separate chips. The result, he argues, is a radical reduction in complexity, energy consumption, and communication overhead.
Yet technology is only part of his larger framework. His deeper argument concerns economics itself. Modern economics, he believes, inherited a mechanistic view of human behavior. Individuals are often treated as collections of incentives responding predictably to external stimuli. Gilder rejects that premise. He sees human beings as creators rather than reactors, inventors rather than calculators. Information, in the tradition of Claude Shannon, is surprise. Growth emerges from unexpected discoveries, new knowledge, and imagination. “Information is surprise, unexpected things,” he said. “It’s creativity and surprise and learning and knowledge that really fuel economic growth.”
This emphasis on creativity leads naturally to his skepticism toward many contemporary claims about artificial intelligence. He argues that machines excel at pattern processing but lack the intuitive and imaginative faculties that characterize human consciousness. In his view, many advocates of technological singularity underestimate the complexity of the human mind by reducing creativity to computation. Randomness may simulate novelty, but simulation is not invention. The distinction matters because civilization advances through genuine insight rather than statistical imitation.
These themes converge in Gilder’s understanding of Israel. His book The Israel Test is not primarily a book about foreign policy. It is a book about how societies respond to excellence. Israel occupies a tiny fraction of the world’s population, yet it exerts an outsized influence on science, technology, entrepreneurship, and scholarship. Gilder views hostility toward Israel as a broader test of whether people resent achievement or seek to learn from it. “How do you respond to people who excel you in accomplishment, intelligence, and wealth creation?” he asked. “Do you resent them and try to tear them down? Or do you emulate them and try to learn from them?”
His admiration for Israel extends beyond culture and into economics. He credits Benjamin Netanyahu’s reforms with transforming a stagnant socialist economy into one of the world’s great centers of innovation. Israel’s emergence as the Startup Nation was not accidental. It resulted from policies that rewarded enterprise, investment, and risk-taking. For Gilder, this transformation illustrates a larger truth. Prosperity arises when societies permit human creativity to circulate freely. Restrictions, bureaucratic obstacles, and envy obstruct that circulation just as effectively as a clot obstructs blood flow through an artery.
The same perspective informs his long-standing concern about family structure. Decades ago, Gilder argued that welfare policies weakened the role of fathers and destabilized families. He maintains that many social problems commonly attributed to race are better understood as consequences of destructive policy choices. He points to the collapse of family formation and declining birth rates as evidence that the modern world faces not a surplus of people but a shortage of future generations. “The real scarcity is human minds and human birth rates,” he said.
Throughout the conversation, one theme returned repeatedly. Wealth is not primarily material. The Stone Age possessed rocks, metals, water, and land. Modern civilization possesses the same planet. What changed was knowledge. Human beings learned. They accumulated information. They passed ideas from one generation to the next and built new discoveries atop old ones. Civilization became richer because it became wiser.
That conviction links Gilder’s work on economics, technology, family, culture, and Israel. The central resource is neither money nor machinery. It is the creative human mind. Everything else follows from that fact.
Discover more from Randy Bock MD PC
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
