In this article, we will delve into the thoughts and perspectives of Sanjeev Sabhlok, a former civil servant and economist, regarding the concept of public health and the government’s response to the pandemic. Sabhlok questions the necessity of various public health measures, challenges the effectiveness of masks and vaccines and emphasizes the importance of individualism, liberty, and critical thinking. Let’s explore his views on economics and liberty, and how they relate to the broken state of public health.
Table of contentsSanjeev Sabhlok’s Background and Criticism of Government ResponseThe Ineffectiveness of Masks and the Role of Engineers in Public HealthQuestioning Vaccines and Occupational Licensing of DoctorsFlaws in Epidemiological Models and Border ClosuresNatural Selection, Herd Immunity, and Influence of Big PharmaProblems with Occupational Licensing of Doctors and FDAFailures of Parliamentary System and Importance of CompetitionCriticizing Public Health and Ethical ImplicationsMalpractice in Medical Practices and Influence of Public InstitutionsFlaws in Public Health Instruction and Long-Term RamificationsEmbracing Individualism, Liberty, and Critical ThinkingConclusionFAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)Related Articles:
Sanjeev Sabhlok’s Background and Criticism of Government Response
Sanjeev Sabhlok’s experience as a civil servant in India and an economist in Australia has shaped his perspective on public health. He resigned from both positions due to his commitment to fighting corruption and his belief in doing things right. Sabhlok criticizes the government’s response to the pandemic, highlighting the lack of transparency and evidence-based decision-making. Despite surviving financially, he faced challenges in finding work as nobody was willing to hire him.
The Ineffectiveness of Masks and the Role of Engineers in Public Health
Sabhlok questions the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19. He references a video where an individual wearing a mask could still see smoke exiting around the edges, suggesting their limited efficacy. Additionally, he argues that much of the work typically attributed to doctors in public health can be accomplished by engineers. He believes that quarantine is necessary for controlling infectious diseases but should be viewed as a police function rather than a healthcare matter.
Questioning Vaccines and Occupational Licensing of Doctors
Sanjeev Sabhlok dives into the public health concept, scrutinizing the use of vaccines and the occupational licensing of doctors. He argues that vaccines are not solely a public health function and that not everyone needs to be vaccinated, even if eradication is possible. Sabhlok is currently working on a comprehensive piece of research to demonstrate that many current public health measures, including water and sanitation initiatives, are unnecessary. He also criticizes the ethics justification used in public health and advocates for objective criteria like cost-benefit analysis.
Flaws in Epidemiological Models and Border Closures
Sabhlok sheds light on the flaws in epidemiological models and questions the logic behind border closures as a means to prevent the spread of viruses. He references Donald Henderson’s research on smallpox, highlighting that symptomatic individuals do not typically travel. The example of the Faroe Islands, which dealt with COVID-19 without resorting to lockdowns or closing schools due to their small
population and proximity, further supports his argument. Sabhlok acknowledges that complete border closures could effectively contain a virus but emphasizes the trade-offs involved.
Natural Selection, Herd Immunity, and Influence of Big Pharma
In this section, Sabhlok discusses the concept of natural selection and herd immunity, drawing an analogy to prey trying to outrun predators. He argues against sacrificing the younger generation to protect the elderly during the pandemi…