Lebanon, once known as the “Switzerland of the Middle East,” is a country with a rich history and a promising beginning. However, in recent decades, it has found itself entangled in conflicts that have stripped it of its neutrality and prosperity. Eli Khoury, a prominent Lebanese political activist and media figure, sheds light on Lebanon’s ongoing struggle for sovereignty. According to Khoury, Lebanon’s conflicts are not purely domestic but driven by foreign influence, particularly through the involvement of Hezbollah, Iran, and Syria.
Table of contents
- Lebanon: The Switzerland of the Middle East
- The Entry of Foreign Influences
- The Political Nature of the Conflict
- Hezbollah: Defender or Instigator?
- The Shift in Hezbollah’s Power
- The Cost of Hezbollah’s Power
- Hezbollah’s Tenuous Claim to Protect Lebanon
- Foreign Influence: Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah’s Axis
- Lebanon’s Struggle for Sovereignty
- A Glimmer of Hope: The Next Generation
- What Must Change for Lebanon to be Free
- The Role of International Community
- The Future of Lebanon: What Lies Ahead
- Conclusion
- FAQs
- Related Articles
Lebanon: The Switzerland of the Middle East
In its early years, Lebanon thrived as a neutral, economically prosperous nation. Its geographic location at the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa made it a hub of trade and culture. Beirut, its capital, was renowned for its cosmopolitan atmosphere, drawing tourists, investors, and intellectuals from across the globe.
However, this golden era did not last. As Khoury puts it, “Lebanon is like the Switzerland of the Middle East, but it’s been caught in wars that aren’t even ours.” The country’s strategic location and political landscape made it vulnerable to external conflicts, with Lebanon becoming a pawn in larger regional power struggles.
The Entry of Foreign Influences
The Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) entered Lebanon in the late 1960s, marking the beginning of foreign entanglements that would plague the country for decades. Initially seen as a refugee issue, the PLO’s presence soon escalated into a significant political and military force within Lebanon. This laid the groundwork for further external interference, including the rise of Hezbollah in the early 1980s.
Hezbollah, backed by Iran and Syria, emerged as a Shiite militia aimed at resisting Israeli occupation. Over time, however, Hezbollah grew into a powerful political entity, heavily influenced by foreign powers. As Khoury noted, “Hezbollah is not just a Shiite party; it’s an unconstitutional militia with foreign backing.”
The Political Nature of the Conflict
Contrary to popular belief, Khoury argues that Lebanon’s conflict is not rooted in religion. “The war was not Christians versus Muslims; it was political—democracy versus autocracy.” The true battle in Lebanon, according to Khoury, is between democratic values and authoritarian rule imposed by foreign interests.
Hezbollah: Defender or Instigator?
Hezbollah initially presented itself as Lebanon’s defender against Israeli aggression. However, over time, its actions have shown that it is more than just a resistance group. Khoury points out that Hezbollah has become a symbol of foreign interference, working in the interests of Iran and Syria rather than Lebanon itself.
Hezbollah has lost the war with Israel, but more importantly, it has lost Lebanon,” Khoury remarked, highlighting the group’s declining political power. Despite this, Hezbollah remains a dominant force due to its military strength, not its political legitimacy.
The Shift in Hezbollah’s Power
Though Hezbollah has lost its political majority, it retains significant influence through its military capabilities. “Without arms, Hezbollah is meaningless—its entire existence hinges on its military might,” Khoury explains. This military presence makes it difficult for Lebanon to achieve peace, as Hezbollah’s power lies not in its political agenda but in its ability to wield force.
The Cost of Hezbollah’s Power
The rise of Hezbollah has come at a great cost to Lebanon. From the devastating Beirut explosion in 2020 to the country’s ongoing economic collapse, Hezbollah’s influence has crippled Lebanon’s institutions. Khoury points out that “we’ve been renting the South to three of the worst regimes: PLO, (Syrian) Baath, and now Tehran,” a metaphor that speaks to the extent of foreign control over Lebanon’s sovereignty.
Hezbollah’s Tenuous Claim to Protect Lebanon
While Hezbollah claims to protect Lebanon from Israeli aggression, Khoury argues that this narrative is deeply flawed. “Hezbollah’s claim to protect Lebanon from Israel has always been a lie; it only attacks after being provoked.” The group’s actions, often spurred by external interests, have led to greater instability rather than security.
Foreign Influence: Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah’s Axis
Iran and Syria’s role in Lebanon’s affairs cannot be understated. Both countries have used Hezbollah as a tool to further their interests in the region, with little regard for Lebanon’s sovereignty. Khoury believes that for Lebanon to be truly free, it must rid itself of this entire axis of influence.
Lebanon’s Struggle for Sovereignty
The fight for Lebanese sovereignty is not just a military or political battle but a cultural one. Lebanon must reclaim its identity and resist the pull of foreign powers if it hopes to rebuild its nation. According to Khoury, true peace can only come when Lebanon is free from the grips of Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran.
A Glimmer of Hope: The Next Generation
Despite the grim reality, Khoury remains cautiously optimistic. He believes that Lebanon’s youth, who have grown up witnessing the devastation caused by Hezbollah and foreign influence, may be the key to change. The next generation does not carry the same ideological ties to Hezbollah, offering hope for a new direction.
What Must Change for Lebanon to be Free
For Lebanon to reclaim its sovereignty, Khoury argues that it must rid itself of Hezbollah, the Syrian Baath regime, and Iranian influence. This would involve both political and military efforts, along with a strong commitment from the international community to support Lebanon’s independence.
The Role of International Community
The international community has a crucial role to play in Lebanon’s recovery. Diplomatic pressure, economic aid, and peacekeeping efforts could help curb Hezbollah’s influence and restore Lebanon’s sovereignty. Global powers must recognize the significance of a free Lebanon in maintaining stability in the Middle East.
The Future of Lebanon: What Lies Ahead
The road ahead for Lebanon is undoubtedly challenging, but with unity, reform, and support from the international community, the country can rise from its current crisis. Rebuilding Lebanon will require removing foreign influence and fostering a culture of democracy and self-determination.
Conclusion
Lebanon’s struggle for sovereignty has been long and fraught with challenges. The influence of Hezbollah, Iran, and Syria has kept the country from achieving true peace. However, with a new generation rising and a potential shift in political and military dynamics, there is hope for Lebanon’s future. The fight for freedom continues, but the path to peace is becoming clearer.
FAQs
Khoury sees Hezbollah as a symbol of foreign interference rather than a defender of Lebanon, arguing that it works for the interests of Iran and Syria.
Hezbollah’s influence has led to political instability, economic collapse, and a loss of sovereignty for Lebanon, according to Khoury.
Khoury believes the conflict is political, a struggle between democracy and autocracy, rather than a religious war between Christians and Muslims.
Khoury suggests that true peace can only come when Lebanon is free from Hezbollah’s military influence and foreign backing.
The international community can support Lebanon through diplomatic pressure, economic aid, and efforts to curb foreign interference.
Related Articles
Discover more from Randy Bock MD PC
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
