Seeds of Dissent: Mark Oshinskie on Judicial Failures and COVID Overreach

Mark Oshinskie, an attorney turned writer, offers a fresh and compelling perspective on contemporary issues. His rich background in environmental litigation and a decade of hands-on gardening informs his unique worldview. Oshinskie’s journey into writing, sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic, has led him to critique what he perceives as judicial failures and societal overreach during the crisis.

Background

Oshinskie’s career in environmental litigation spanned three decades, providing him with a profound understanding of legal intricacies and courtroom dynamics. His transition to a more grounded life, growing food and flowers, allowed him to witness the natural cycles of life, enriching his perspective on human existence and societal responses.

Beginning of Writing Journey

When the COVID-19 pandemic struck, Oshinskie felt an urgent need to document the events and reactions he witnessed. This period marked the beginning of his writing journey, where he aimed to offer a counter-narrative to what he considered a widespread overreaction.

The “Scamdemic” Essays

Oshinskie’s book, a series of essays, weaves together personal anecdotes from his upbringing and observations during the pandemic. These essays challenge the mainstream narratives, offering readers a different lens through which to view the crisis.

Gardening and Life Cycles

Drawing parallels between gardening and human life, Oshinskie criticizes the societal response to COVID-19. He suggests that, much like plants, humans go through natural life cycles, and the extreme measures taken during the pandemic were often disproportionate, especially concerning the elderly.

Consequences of Dissent

Oshinskie’s outspoken views did not come without repercussions. He faced censorship on platforms like Medium, where his posts were reported and removed. These actions nearly cost him his job, illustrating the challenges of voicing dissent in a polarized environment.

Substack and Continued Advocacy

Undeterred, Oshinskie transitioned to Substack, a platform that allowed him to continue sharing his views without censorship. Here, he found a community of like-minded individuals and a space to advocate for his beliefs freely.

Health and Self-Care

Oshinskie draws a vivid analogy between plant health and human health. He argues that just as healthy plants are less prone to pests, humans who maintain their health require fewer medical interventions. This viewpoint critiques the modern over-reliance on medications, advocating for a more natural approach to health and wellness.

Importance of Personal Observation

A key theme in Oshinskie’s writings is the importance of personal observation and critical thinking. He urges readers to rely on their own experiences and observations rather than accepting media representations at face value. This approach encourages a deeper understanding and questioning of prevalent narratives.

Legal Career and Challenging Authority

Oshinskie’s legal career is marked by his willingness to challenge authority. He recalls a notable case where he represented residents against a town ordinance, resulting in a victory that highlighted judicial biases. This experience mirrored his observations during the COVID-19 pandemic, where he perceived similar biases and overreach.

Reflections on the Justice System

Through his legal battles, Oshinskie developed a keen awareness of the political and personal biases that can influence judicial decisions. He draws parallels between his legal experiences and the broader societal reactions to COVID-19, underscoring the need for independent thought and skepticism.

Encouraging Independent Thought

Oshinskie’s writing serves as a call to action, encouraging readers to think independently and critically evaluate societal norms. By sharing his own journey and reflections, he hopes to inspire others to question and understand the world around them more deeply.

Conclusion

Mark Oshinskie’s journey from environmental litigation to writing about the COVID-19 pandemic offers a unique perspective on societal overreach and judicial failures. His essays, grounded in personal experience and critical observation, challenge mainstream narratives and advocate for independent thought.

FAQs

Related Articles

• Jonathan Leaf’s Making Philosophy Accessible
• Judicial Bias: Dr. Bharani Padmanabhan Part II; The Courts Purposefully Ignore an Emergency?
• Prof. Norman Fenton: Vaccine Study Flaws and London Challenges
• Uncovering Judicial Bias: Dr. Bharani Padmanabhan’s Forensic Journey
• Marry by Choice, Not by Chance: Princeton Mom Susan Patton’s Expert Advice