Jeffrey Peel “Remember: the worst virus is propaganda” [ReBroadcast From March 2, 2023]

In this article, we will summarize the key points discussed by Jeffrey Peel in his rebroadcasted video titled “Remember: the worst virus is propaganda.” Peel expresses his frustration with government policies, forced medical interventions, and the censorship of dissenting views during the COVID-19 pandemic. He questions the effectiveness of lockdowns, social distancing, and vaccination programs while highlighting the potential impact on society. Peel also delves into the relationship between drug companies, regulators, and the government in the context of the COVID-19 vaccine. Lastly, he touches upon the misapplication of COVID-19 measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.

Jeffrey Peel’s Frustration with Government Policies

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Jeffrey Peel, a UK-based geo-political consultant, witnessed entire nations being locked down and observed the devastating impact on business owners’ livelihoods. He became increasingly frustrated with government policies and appalled by forced medical interventions, including mandated vaccines for public workers. Peel and many others faced de-platforming and censorship for expressing dissenting views. He resigned from his consultancy role in government to join the dissenting population. Over time, Peel’s concerns regarding various COVID-19 topics, such as the origins in Wuhan, natural immunity, and the effectiveness of lockdowns, were proven right.

Forced Medical Interventions and Censorship

Peel highlights the absurdity of regulations and the negative economic consequences resulting from travel restrictions during the pandemic. He questions the unequal treatment at the border, suggesting that those traveling without papers and vaccination status enjoy advantages over official travelers. Peel also discusses high-profile cases, including Novak Djokovic and Kyrie Irving, who faced vaccination-related restrictions. The racial divide that emerged when vaccine cards were introduced in New York City is also addressed. Peel emphasizes the importance of dissenting voices and mentions collaborating with Joel Smalley, a researcher analyzing COVID-related data.

Questioning the Need for Lockdowns and Vaccination Programs

Peel discusses the analysis conducted by Joel Smalley regarding deaths in minority populations with lower vaccination rates. He praises Smalley’s research and criticizes media outlets like the BBC for propagating the lockdown narrative without conducting in-depth interviews. Peel emphasizes the negative effects of interventions on children, such as mandatory mask-wearing in classrooms, hindering both learning and non-verbal communication. He raises concerns about censorship, citing instances where his interviews were removed from platforms like YouTube, LinkedIn, and even mainstream media outlets.

The Relationship between Drug Companies, Regulators, and the Government

Peel delves into the relationship between drug companies, regulators, and the government in the context of the COVID-19 vaccine. He questions the influence of corporate interests and points out the coincidence between money flow and vaccine-related patents and initial public offerings. Peel emphasizes the need to weigh the risks and benefits of vaccination objectively, rather than promoting it as a means to regain certain privileges. He mentions Rochelle Wolensky, the current CDC head, and her justification for mask mandates based on a study conducted in Provincetown.

Misapplication of COVID-19 Measures

Peel discusses the misapplication of COVID-19 measures, such as mask mandates and lockdowns, specifically in response to the Omicron variant. He questions the validity of the virology science used to isolate the virus and the assumption of causality. Peel suggests that Omicron, despite being a new variant, may be no more severe than a common cold-level coronavirus. He argues that overreacting to Omicron leads to unnecessary draconian measures.

Conclusion

Jeffrey Peel concludes that propaganda has been the worst virus during the COVID-19 pandemic. He highlights how centralized corporatized control, fueled by propaganda, has caused people to lose their agency. Peel discusses the movement of elderly patients from hospitals to care homes and questions the necessity of lockdowns, social distancing, and vaccination programs. He raises concerns about the impact on narcotic overdose deaths and the attempt to silence dissenting voices. Peel encourages free thinking and the recognition of genuine Black Swan events.

FAQs

In summary, Jeffrey Peel’s rebroadcasted video provides insights into the frustrations with government policies, forced medical interventions, and censorship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Peel questions the need for certain measures, highlights the relationship between drug companies, regulators, and the government, and discusses the misapplication of COVID-19 measures. It is essential to critically evaluate these perspectives and consider multiple viewpoints when forming an informed opinion on the subject.

Related Articles

• Interviewing Edward Dowd: Unusual Excess Mortality 2021 in Younger Age Groups
• Evaluating Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s Insights (Part-1)
• Carlos Blanco on Ecuador & Argentina’s Election Hopes and Turmoil
• Dr. Mary Talley Bowden: Championing the Right to Try